Epistemic Limits and the Inaccessibility of Trauma in Dying City
Abstract
This paper analyzes Christopher Shinn’s Dying City as a depiction of trauma that evades typical frameworks of loss, grief, and psychological paralysis. Reading it from the perspectives of contemporary trauma theory, the paper argues that the play presents trauma as an epistemic and moral standstill rather than an accessible and healable wound. Using core arguments of trauma theorists such as Cathy Caruth and Dominick LaCapra, the paper finds that the play dramatizes trauma as an unclaimed experience which is resistant to closure and remains inaccessible to the talking cure. The protagonist’s disillusionment with the cherished ideals behind a war he once believed in leads to a crisis of the self, primarily due to a shattering realization of his own complicity in the atrocities committed in the name of justice. Through emphatic stage devices such as pauses, fragmented narration, non-linear timeframe, and doubling of roles, the play skillfully employs the theatrical medium to stage the limits of knowing such incidents. The play also showcases how trauma moves beyond the individual to involve the survivors left behind in intimate domestic spaces. Their continuous struggle with the uncertainty of events relates to the core claim of the inaccessibility of trauma for those who survive. By exploring trauma as an ethical crisis alongside its psycho-social dimensions, this paper extends the implications of trauma in existing research on post-9/11 literature and adds a new dimension to debates around the morality of modern warfare, cultural trauma, and collective responsibility.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
Christopher Shinn’s Dying City is a formative play about the grim impact of the Iraq War in the wake of the upsurge of an absolute communal desire for retributive action after the 9/11 attacks. With its seemingly calm domestic setting reflecting on the burning universal themes of war, absences, silences, and death, it became a finalist for the 2008 Pulitzer Prize for Drama. There is no contesting that Dying City is a political drama with its backdrop of the Iraq War, its focus on 9/11, and how it turned New York into a dying city. However, the political in the play has been dexterously synthesized with the personal to narrate the tale of an individual loss that a common family in New York suffered as a result of the ongoing war, and the corresponding state of disillusionment and chaos a nation suffers in a blind rage for vengeance. It is Shinn’s mastery that even though the play is centrally concerned with the day of the attacks and the resultant traumatic bearings of the war against terrorism in Iraq, it does not make explicit references to war or over-dramatize its aftermath.
Existing critical works focus on the cultural interpretations of the 9/11 attacks, the sense of urgency and collective helplessness they generated, and the traumatic aftermath endured by survivors and witnesses. Shinn’s play also explores this disillusionment, raising critical questions about the moral grounds for the war in Iraq. This paper attempts to read Dying City as a play that dramatizes trauma as an experience characterized by epistemic limits—something that cannot be fully grasped or resolved by those who go through it. Using contemporary trauma theory, the paper argues that the play presents trauma as a fragmentary experience that resists closure either through narration or medical assistance. It also reads the play in larger contexts to ascertain how national violence can impact the most intimate spheres of domestic life. In doing so, it pays due recognition to the ethical cost of warfare, reframing trauma as a crisis of the encumbered self.
Existing research on the play lays significant thrust on its concerns with national grief, waning popular trust in political narratives, and the longstanding psychic wounds inflicted by terrorism and endless conflicts. Scholars have primarily focused on the vulnerable self and American identity in the days following the attacks on the Twin Towers. However, a specific kind of trauma—that of complicity—has received less consideration in literary research. The play foregrounds this complicity as a central concern rather than staging trauma merely as a shielding response to violence experienced. Read through trauma theory, studies often relate Cathy Caruth’s concept of belatedness to instances of silence, repetitiveness, and fragmentation but rarely relate it to the ethical conundrum of realizing complicity, which also comes to affect the survivor belatedly. Even in the case of cultural trauma, critics often examine the play to ascertain the extent to which national crisis affects individual lives. This paper aligns the focus of such inquiries from trauma as an agonizing wound to trauma as an ethical crisis, arguing that the play dramatizes the limits of knowledge in comprehending traumatic experiences of war and annihilation.
Conclusion
Dying City is a disturbing dramatization of trauma that goes beyond usual narratives of mourning and national loss. Craig’s gradual disillusionment and his realization of complicity in violence expose a trauma rooted in ethical dimensions rather than merely physical or psychological harm. His description of a wound he does not feel underscores the inexpressibility and inaccessibility of trauma. His death evidences the disorienting impact of ethical corruption. The play also shows how such trauma extends beyond the individual: Kelly and Peter continue to grapple with a ruptured present, circling a past they cannot inhabit. Their inability to ascertain the truth of Craig’s final moments reinforces the epistemic limits of traumatic experience—it can never be fully comprehended, and survival requires enduring its uncertainty.
Through its innovative theatrical form—doubling, fragmentation, silence—Dying City stages the very impossibility of representing trauma. It reframes trauma as an ethical crisis of complicity, challenging readers and audiences to confront the moral ambiguities of war and the enduring, inaccessible wounds it leaves on soldiers, families, and nations
References
- Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J., & Sztompka, P. (2004). Cultural trauma and collective identity. University of California Press.
- Benson, S. (Ed.). (2013). The Methuen Drama book of new American plays. Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.
- Berger, J. (1997). Review: Trauma and literary theory. Contemporary Literature, 38(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/1208980
- Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Jena, D., & Samantray, K. (2021). Traumatic experiences and their representation in narratives: A study. International Journal of English Language Studies, 3(11), 1–6.
- LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Shinn, C. (2008). Dying city. Theatre Communications Group.
- Tal, K. (1996). Worlds of hurt: Reading the literatures of trauma. Cambridge University Press.
- Ullah, I. (2020). War memory, psychological trauma, and literary witnessing: Afghan cultural production in focus. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020961128.