Graphic Silence and Political Dissent: Memory, Power, and Resistance in Delhi Calm
Abstract
This paper examines Vishwajyoti Ghosh’s Delhi Calm (2010) as a paradigmatic graphic narrative that stages political dissent through what can be termed “graphic silence”: the deliberate use of visual omission, negative space, fragmented panels, and allegorical absence to represent repression, censorship, and the contested production of cultural memory during the Indian Emergency (1975–1977). Moving beyond conventional readings of political comics that emphasize satire or direct allegory alone, the study argues that Delhi Calm uses silence as an aesthetic and rhetorical strategy to register trauma, complicity, and resistance. Drawing on New Historicism, cultural memory theory, and graphic-narrative scholarship, the paper performs a sustained text–image analysis of the novel’s major sequences, focusing on its deployment of animal allegory, urban iconography, panel rhythm, and visual metaphors for surveillance. Methodologically, the study combines close formal analysis of panels and sequences with contextualization in historical scholarship on the Emergency and memory studies. The analysis shows that Ghosh’s visual grammar—gutter silence, collapsed chronology, repetitive framing, and the substitution of absent human faces with symbolic animal masks—creates a counter-archive that both bears witness to and critiques official historiography. By staging silence rather than narrating every fact, Delhi Calm invites readers to inhabit the affective textures of fear and to interrogate processes of forgetting and enforced amnesia. The paper concludes that graphic silence functions as a mode of political dissent: it exposes the limits of overt protest under authoritarian conditions, preserves marginalized memories, and models an ethics of reading attentive to omission as evidence. Delhi Calm therefore expands the formal and political possibilities of Indian graphic literature and provides a vital intervention in debates about memory, power, and representation in postcolonial democratic cultures.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
The Indian Emergency (June 1975–March 1977) represents a rupture in post-Independence Indian political life that continues to reverberate through historical, literary, and cultural discourse. During that period, democratic institutions were suspended, censorship intensified, and myriad personal liberties were curtailed; yet, the event’s representation in literature and public memory has been shaped by competing narratives of necessity, excess, courage, and complicity. Within this contested field, Vishwajyoti Ghosh’s Delhi Calm (2010) emerges as a significant and formally adventurous attempt to represent the Emergency in graphic form. Unlike documentary histories or testimonial prose, Ghosh’s graphic novel foregrounds the sensory and affective dimension of living under authoritarian rule: silence, muffled voices, enforced compliance, and quotidian acts of survival.
This paper proposes to read Delhi Calm through the concept of graphic silence, which can be defined as the strategic use of pictorial omission, negative space, panel-collapse, non-diegetic gaps, and allegorical substitution to communicate what direct representation cannot—trauma, censorship, and the workings of power. Graphic silence does not simply denote absence; it is an active representational device. When harnessed within political graphic narratives, it can function both as testimonial practice and as resistance by mobilizing readers’ inferences and ethical attention.
The study addresses three interlocking questions: (1) How does Delhi Calm formalize silence in its visual rhetoric, and with what political effects? (2) In what ways does the novel’s visual grammar produce an alternative memory of the Emergency that complicates official historiography? (3) How might the concept of graphic silence help us understand the politics of representation in other accounts of state repression?
To answer these questions, the paper proceeds in four parts. Section 2 reviews relevant scholarship: graphic narrative theory, memory studies, and critical work on Indian political comics. Section 3 sets out the theoretical apparatus: New Historicism, cultural memory theory, and the visual semiotics of comics. Section 4 details the methodology and offers a close, sustained analysis of Delhi Calm’s representative sequences, organized under thematic headings: silence and censorship; animal allegory and depersonalization; urban space as an instrument of control; and the ethics/politics of readerly participation. The paper closes with conclusions about the novel’s contribution to cultural memory and political dissent and proposes directions for further research.
Conclusion
Vishwajyoti Ghosh’s Delhi Calm offers a compelling model for thinking about how graphic narratives can engage political trauma and memory when direct representation is ethically fraught or historically contested. By enacting graphic silence—the deliberate, formal production of absence—the novel performs dissent: it documents repression without rendering it spectacle, critiques authoritarian rhetoric through allegory and urban mise-en-scène, and invites readers to participate in the often-difficult labor of remembering.
This paper has argued that graphic silence is not a failure of representation but a tactical, ethical choice that enables a deeper engagement with the politics of memory. Delhi Calm thereby contributes to evolving conversations in comics studies, memory studies, and postcolonial cultural critique—showing how form and politics are mutually constitutive. The concept of graphic silence provides a new critical lens for analyzing how comics can articulate resistance under constraints, making a distinct contribution to graphic narrative theory.
Areas for further research include comparative studies of graphic silence across global contexts (e.g., comparing Delhi Calm with Persepolis or Maus), empirical studies of reader reception and pedagogical use in teaching modern Indian history, and archival work tracing the afterlife of such graphic counter-archives in public discourse.
Ultimately, Delhi Calm demonstrates the capacity of the graphic medium to sustain political memory in democratic societies where forgetting can be legislated and dissent suppressed.
References
- Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination (D. H. Wilson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1992)
- Banerjee, S. (2004). Corridor. Penguin Books.
- Chute, H. L. (2010). Graphic women: Life narrative and contemporary comics. Columbia University Press.
- Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
- Ghosh, V. (2010). Delhi calm. HarperCollins.
- Greenblatt, S. (1990). Learning to curse: Essays in early modern culture. Routledge.
- Hirsch, M. (2012). The generation of postmemory: Writing and visual culture after the Holocaust. Columbia University Press.
- McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. Kitchen Sink Press.
- McCloud, S. (2000). Reinventing comics: How imagination and technology are revolutionizing an art form. William Morrow.
- Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. W. W. Norton & Company.