Postcolonial Narratives and the "Crisis of Imagination" in the Anthropocene
Abstract
Climate change poses a problem that fiction has struggled to address. Amitav Ghosh names this failure the "Great Derangement," a civilizational blindness built into the modern novel itself. This paper examines how postcolonial narrative, and Ghosh's own fiction in particular, responds to what he calls a crisis of imagination in the Anthropocene. The essay begins with Ghosh's diagnosis in The Great Derangement: the realist novel's commitment to probability and the ordinary pushes catastrophic weather into genres it treats as lesser, such as science fiction. The novel's inherited focus on individual consciousness, developed through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, cannot easily encompass a crisis that is collective, planetary, and slow. Modern rationalism resists a world where nonhuman forces act with an apparent intention, and this resistance is cultural at root, not merely scientific. The paper then reads The Hungry Tide, Ghosh's novel of the Sundarbans, as an attempt to write climate crisis differently. Its shifting tidal islands, its cyclone, and its account of the Morichjhapi refugee settlement show ecological catastrophe and political displacement as inseparable. Drawing on postcolonial ecocriticism, particularly the work of Graham Huggan, Helen Tiffin, Rob Nixon, and Dipesh Chakrabarty, the paper argues that climate change cannot be understood through meteorology alone. It is a problem of colonial history, uneven carbon responsibility, and power. The conclusion asks what kinds of art might address a submerged future, one where the Sundarbans, Bangladesh, and other low-lying regions of the Global South face the earliest and harshest consequences of a crisis they did least to cause. Postcolonial narrative does not solve the crisis of imagination. It offers a place to begin.
Keywords
Download Options
Introduction
In 2016, Amitav Ghosh made an uncomfortable claim. Serious fiction, he argued, has mostly failed to take climate change as its subject. Novelists write about love, ambition, and family, but rarely about the flood outside the window. Ghosh calls this failure The Great Derangement, and he means it as a collective diagnosis, not an insult aimed at individual writers. If future generations judge this era as a time of madness, he suggests, they will point first to its imaginative failure, and only second to its carbon output (Ghosh 2016). This paper takes that claim as a starting point and asks what postcolonial narrative can do with it.
This paper reads that failure alongside a body of postcolonial writing that has quietly been working on parts of the problem for decades. Writers working from the Global South rarely had the luxury of treating environmental catastrophe as an occasional plot device. Drought, flood, and displacement already sat close to the center of the histories they were telling. The argument moves in four steps. It first lays out Ghosh's diagnosis of The Great Derangement across the four difficulties named below. It then looks closely at how the problem of scale plays out in the ordinary distinction between literary fiction and genre fiction. It reads The Hungry Tide as a sustained answer to that problem—one built directly out of the Sundarbans and its history of displacement. And it closes by asking what postcolonial ecocriticism, as a field, contributes once the climate crisis is understood as a matter of culture and power rather than weather alone.
This paper argues that postcolonial narrative, and Ghosh's own fiction in particular, offers a way through the crisis of imagination by refusing to separate ecological catastrophe from histories of colonial power, displacement, and uneven responsibility. Why turn to postcolonial narrative specifically, rather than climate fiction in general? This is partly because the difficulties Ghosh names were never evenly distributed. Writers from formerly colonized regions inherited literary conventions built in and for societies that had long treated the climate crisis as a distant future, a problem to be modeled and managed rather than lived. Postcolonial societies, by contrast, have long histories of living with ecological instability as an ordinary condition of colonial and postcolonial rule, from famine policy under empire to development-era dam building and forced resettlement. Narrative traditions shaped by that history start from a different set of assumptions about how much control any character, or any government, actually holds over the land beneath them.
Conclusion
Where does this leave literature now? Ghosh's own answer, sketched at the end of The Great Derangement, is not a set of rules for a better climate novel. It is closer to a wish that writers find ways to let the improbable back in, to let landscapes act, and to let stories move across scales that do not fit inside one lifetime. The Hungry Tide had already tried some of this before Ghosh named the problem directly. Its most telling formal choice may be its use of the Bon Bibi legend, the local story of a forest goddess who protects the honest from Dokkhin Rai, the tiger demon, but only if they take no more from the forest than they need. The legend sits inside the novel next to Piya's field notes and Nirmal's political notebook, three different registers of knowledge that the book refuses to rank. Myth here is not decoration. It is a working theory of limits, developed by people who had to live with a landscape that could kill them, long before anyone called that landscape an ecosystem under threat.
Western environmental writing, from Thoreau onward, mostly kept myth and science in separate rooms, treating the mythic as a metaphor for feeling rather than a genuine claim about how a landscape works. The Hungry Tide declines that separation. Bon Bibi's story functions inside the novel as something closer to local ecological law—a codified limit on how much a person may take from the forest, dressed in the language of the sacred because that is the language the tide country's residents actually use to talk about limits. A submerged future will need exactly this kind of hybrid form, one willing to treat non-scientific knowledge as a source of working truth rather than folklore to be admired and then set aside.
This suggests one direction for the art a submerged future will need. It will probably not come from choosing science over story, or local knowledge over global data. It will come from forms willing to hold several kinds of knowing at once, the way the tide country's residents already do, without pretending any single one is sufficient by itself. Postcolonial narrative has practice at this. It has spent decades working out how to tell stories across languages, cosmologies, and unequal histories that refuse to sit still. That practice turns out to be useful training for a crisis that will not remain static either, and it shows up in small formal choices as much as large ones—in a willingness to let a legend share a page with a field report, or to let a delta's shifting geography set the terms of a plot rather than simply hosting it.
None of this addresses the crisis of imagination that Ghosh describes in the sense of solving it. Bangladesh and the Sundarbans are not waiting for a better novel. Islands are disappearing on a schedule set by physics, not literature. But culture shapes what a society can see as urgent, and what it allows itself to act on. A literature that keeps freak weather, displaced people, and nonhuman agency at its margins will keep producing readers unprepared for a century that has already arrived. A literature willing to let the tide into the narrative, the way The Hungry Tide does, offers something smaller than a solution and more useful than despair. It offers practice in imagining a world that does not hold still, which may be the only kind of world left to imagine.
References
- Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, *35*(2), 197-222.
- Clark, T. (2015). Ecocriticism on the edge: The Anthropocene as a threshold concept. Bloomsbury Academic.
- DeLoughrey, E., & Handley, G. B. (Eds.). (2011). Postcolonial ecologies: Literatures of the environment. Oxford University Press.
- Ghosh, A. (2004). The hungry tide. HarperCollins.
- Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press.
- Guha, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (1997). Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South. Earthscan.
- Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of place and sense of planet: The environmental imagination of the global. Oxford University Press.
- Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2010). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. Routledge.
- Mukherjee, U. P. (2010). Postcolonial environments: Nature, culture and the contemporary Indian novel in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.